It wouldn’t take much for WordRake to be worth the $99 it costs to use it for a year, whether for contract drafting or for all your writing. And trust me-no one is as accomplished as they think they are. How much value you would attribute to that would presumably depend on how accomplished a writer you are. Consider WordRake just one level of review, one dedicated to reminding you of some basic ways to make your prose less flabby. In fact, it would be best to have several sets of eyes reviewing your work. No one’s is we all would benefit from having an extra set of eyes to point out the annoying tics in one’s prose. So here’s where I come out on this: Comments made to the manuscript of MSCD3 by a squad of volunteers confirmed the obvious: my prose isn’t perfect.
And making at least some of them would have shaved a few words off of appendix 1-C and made it marginally more concise. On the other hand, most fixes that WordRake proposed were worth considering. WordRake isn’t capable of identifying the dozens of other issues that caused me to thoroughly rewrite appendix 1-A and turn it into appendix 1-C. In MSCD terms, these changes would all fall under “drafting as writing.” In the grand scheme of things, they’re trivial. to determine instead of for purposes of determining.after termination of this agreement instead of after the date of termination of this agreement.WordRake proposed the same sorts of changes to both versions:
So I signed up for the free three-day trial and I ran through WordRake two versions of a contract I know well-the “before” and “after” versions of the “golden parachute” termination agreement included as appendix 1-A and appendix 1-C in the third edition of A Manual of Style for Contract Drafting. Bob Ambrogi gave WordRake a try and wrote about it in this LawSites post, but I thought I should check it out from a contracts perspective. When a reader asked me what I thought of WordRake, I recalled having spoken with the founder, Gary Kinder, a few years ago. You’ll instantly see that WordRake law office software saves time and money, and gives you the confidence your brief, contract, or memorandum is as clear and concise as you can make it. WordRake describes itself as “The first legal editing software for lawyers.” Here’s how it works:Ĭompose in Word, hit the “RAKE” button, and in seconds, WordRake editing software for attorneys suggests edits for a more powerful statement.
0 kommentar(er)
